Andre Huijts wrote:
Yeah saw that (I even posted in the thread when I was still active there (Level42).
I was lucky that my 6800 was a "jumpered version"....
Yes, it looks like it should be fine, but the test fixture I have verifies that the pod meets Flukes standards, not just that the darn thing appears to be a 6502. Docs on the test fixtures going up shortly... John :-#)#
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 15 dec. 2012 om 19:37 heeft John Robertson <jrr@flippers.com> het volgende geschreven:
Andre Huijts wrote:
So that should work on a converted 6800 pod as well because they are really identical.
Not all 6800 pods are dual pods - the early ones were dedicated to the 6800 and need to have a fair bit of modification done. Here is a link to someone that has done that, however I have not done this so have not verified the results with my Fluke factory 6502 pod test fixture.
http://forums.arcade-museum.com/showthread.php?t=217476
I'm going to check that out in January and will report to the list.
John :-#)#
Op 15 dec. 2012 om 03:14 heeft John Robertson <jrr@flippers.com> het volgende geschreven:
Andre Huijts wrote:
Decided to convert my 6800 to a 6502 pod tonight. I was lucky as both pos are the "jumper type" so it was merely copying the jumper set-up from the 6502 and replacing the 6800 with the 6502 of the defective pod.
Hooked it up to the 9100A and it went through self-test without any problem :)
Just for fun, I replaced the 6502 with a CM630P (bought 5 from Bulgaria on e-bay) and sure enough it went through self-test fine again.
André Huijts andre.huijts@upcmail.nl
The regular 6502 pod supports a 6502B so put the fastest one you can find in it...
John :-#)#
_______________________________________________ Techtoolslist mailing list Techtoolslist@flippers.com http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/techtoolslist FTP site is: ftp://ttl.arcadetech.org Archive site: http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/techtoolslist/