I don't like the new format. So I have changed back to /No/ Not that anyone else has complained, and if folks prefer the style of the last couple of weeks please let me know. This is merely my personal preference to have the sender more obvious in my email list, rather than being more anonymous. John :-#(# On 02/01/2016 9:33 PM, John Robertson via Techtoolslist wrote:
It has come to my attention that at least one person is having trouble posting to the list. I did find this setting explanation:
/*from_is_list*//(general): Replace the From: header address with the list's posting address to mitigate issues stemming from the original From: domain's DMARC or similar policies./
/Several protocols now in wide use attempt to ensure that use of the domain in the author's address (ie, in the From: header field) is authorized by that domain. These protocols may be incompatible with common list features such as footers, causing participating email services to bounce list traffic merely because of the address in the From: field. //*This has resulted in members being unsubscribed despite being perfectly able to receive mail.*/
/The following actions are applied to all list messages when selected here. To apply these actions only to messages where the domain in the From: header is determined to use such a protocol, see the //dmarc_moderation_action <https://pairlist7.pair.net/mailman/admin/techtoolslist/?VARHELP=privacy/sender/dmarc_moderation_action>//settings under Privacy options... -> Sender filters. /
/Settings:/
/No/ /Do nothing special. This is appropriate for anonymous lists. It is appropriate for dedicated announcement lists, unless the From: address of authorized posters might be in a domain with a DMARC or similar policy. It is also appropriate if you choose to use dmarc_moderation_action other than Accept for this list./ /Munge From/ /This action replaces the poster's address in the From: header with the list's posting address and adds the poster's address to the addresses in the original Reply-To: header./ /Wrap Message/ /Just wrap the message in an outer message with the From: header containing the list's posting address and with the original From: address added to the addresses in the original Reply-To: header and with Content-Type: message/rfc822. This is effectively a one message MIME format digest./
//
/The transformations for anonymous_list are applied before any of these actions. It is not useful to apply actions other than No to an anonymous list, and if you do so, the result may be surprising. /
/The Reply-To: header munging actions below interact with these actions as follows: /
/first_strip_reply_to = Yes will remove all the incoming Reply-To: addresses but will still add the poster's address to Reply-To: for all three settings of reply_goes_to_list which respectively will result in just the poster's address, the poster's address and the list posting address or the poster's address and the explicit reply_to_address in the outgoing Reply-To: header. If first_strip_reply_to = No the poster's address in the original From: header, if not already included in the Reply-To:, will be added to any existing Reply-To: address(es). /
/These actions, whether selected here or via //dmarc_moderation_action <https://pairlist7.pair.net/mailman/admin/techtoolslist/?VARHELP=privacy/sender/dmarc_moderation_action>//, do not apply to messages in digests or archives or sent to usenet via the Mail<->News gateways. /
/If //dmarc_moderation_action <https://pairlist7.pair.net/mailman/admin/techtoolslist/?VARHELP=privacy/sender/dmarc_moderation_action>//applies to this message with an action other than Accept, that action rather than this is applied/
and I have changed the setting from No to Munge From.
I hope that fixes the problem!
If anyone know why I should NOT make this change please let me know via email!
Thanks,
John :-#)#
-- How to subscribe or unsubscribe from TTL http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/techtoolslist