I just bought one but only have the 8085 pod, so far. Since you're unhappy with yours, you can sell me your other pods. There was a guy selling a U820 8080 analyzer in Victoria, recently. Brendan Keith brendan.keith@wilcom.com
---------- From: John Robertson[SMTP:jrr@flippers.com] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 1999 12:09 PM To: techtoolslist@flippers.com Subject: Fluke 9010
How many folks are using this gizmo? I find it rather slow in comparison to the Atari CAT BOX. Also the fact that the Pod self test doesn't check the upper address lines is not so great either...how is one to be sure they are running correctly?
Follow up on my chat about this 9010 gizmo. What is it with the ROM checksums with this beastie? They are not the standard ones, and I am not sure what they represent. Here is what I get and the "correct" checksums" Fluke: Normal: 3C61 A1A3 225B 325D FD8B 1C21 Reading random bits in the Rom with the fluke gives the correct data every time, tried the first and last bytes too. The more I read the manual the better this thing looks, but I need some idea of the basic assumptions that Fluke used for the "Signature" of the ROMs. Thanks! John :-#)#
participants (2)
-
John Robertson -
Keith, Brendan