Is it not easier to just use a NOP fixture for the processor? Perhaps some genius here could write a routine that happily steps through each and every address line the same as a NOP does. This would work for any pod then...handy!

John:-#)#

At 10:11 PM 22/01/2002 +0000, Peter Fyfe wrote:

Folks,

Has anyone used the SA option on the Fluke yet. I've been playing around with space invaders and the RAM failures that are due to other TTL chips. It occured to me that when you loop on a read instruction you get a fairly stable train of pulses on a lot of the IC's which would make it ideal for SA.

Does anybody know if you can READ 2000 and LOOP on it and still use the Fluke for the SA.

Just wondering

Peter

PS I do have some checksum data for various boards, none of which has been verified. Pete Davies (Invadar) was going to host these but if anyone is interested I can type then up and you can use them at your leisure / risk.